The holiday season is upon us and typically it brings with it much joy, but it seems some people are not so holly and jolly this year and are bringing controversy with them to the this wonderful time of the year.
A few holiday classics, ranging from tv specials to songs, have sparked an uproar in recent days, with some making claims of racism and sexism.
Read on for a look at what some debating about these holiday classics this year.
âRudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeerâ
HuffPost made huge headlines after they tweeted a video alleging the Christmas classic âRudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeerâ is a âbigotedâ film that features bullying and sexism.
âViewers are noticing the tale may not be so jolly after all,â the outletâs video stated. âAnd theyâre sharing their observations online.â
The video grouped together online responses to the classic special, citing one person who even claimed the movie presents racist and homophobic components. The video also states that Rudolph’s father, Donner, verbally abused his son. Then it also claimed Donner made a sexist comment to Rudolph’s mother when he forbade her from searching for their son after he went missing.
âNo, this is manâs work,â Donner says in the film.
But many people who viewed the video disagreed with the interpretation and wrote on Twitter that the publication missed the mark.
The holiday TV classic “Rudolph The Red-Nosed Reindeer” is seriously problematic. ? pic.twitter.com/dOgqPF3bAP
â HuffPost (@HuffPost) November 29, 2018
âRudolph was about a reindeer who showed others that being different is a good thing. It showed viewers that just because you may be different doesn’t mean you can’t overcome difficult obstacles in life,â one person tried to argue.
âThis 54yr old childrenâs movie teaches lessons of acceptance, equality, forgiveness, perseverance. It teaches people not to be judgmental, it teaches itâs ok to be & to accept those different from yourself. All lessons people could still learn today. Thatâs hardly problematic [in my opinion],â another had wrote.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gEQb2OppEow
âA Charlie Brown Thanksgivingâ
ABCâs âA Charlie Brown Thanksgivingâ was also hit with backlash this year. Critics quickly jumped on board and slammed the classic film as racist, citing the portrayal of the filmâs sole black character, Franklin even though no one seemed to say anything since its 1973 debut and airing each year since.
During the holiday eating scene, Franklin is seen sitting alone one side of the table while many of the peanuts white characters are seated on the other side of the table together. Franklin also appears to be sitting in an unstable or broken lawn chair, that causes him to topple over at one point. The other white characters seem to be seated in sturdier-looking strong chairs.
âWhy is Franklin in Charlie Brown Thanksgiving sitting all by himself at the table. Man. Things that I did not notice as a child,â one person wrote on Twitter following the 1973 filmâs airing the day before the turkey-filled holiday this year.
Critics blast ‘A Charlie Brown Thanksgiving’ as racist https://t.co/i8FqiWh8kg pic.twitter.com/EFfuaVa3Eo
â New York Post (@nypost) November 23, 2018
âThey give our friend the busted chair and wonât even sit on the same side of the table, more proof that Charlie Brown and his cohorts are RACIST,â wrote another.
But as one Twitter user noted, âPeanutsâ creator Charles M. Schulz was a âtrailblazerâ who âbucked racism.â
âSeriously please get some historical context. Charles M. Schulz was a trailblazer and bucked racism in those days by adding Franklin to reflect the issue⊠and challenging what was then going on in society,â Mark Larson, a radio show host in California, tweeted.
âBaby itâs Cold Outsideâ

Now a radio station in Ohio removed the 1944 classic holiday song âBaby, Itâs Cold Outsideâ from its song playlist. Star 102 Cleveland, the station which removed the song, released in a statement that the lyrics are âvery manipulative and wrong,â.
A few lines in the song which are traditionally sung by a woman – âSay, what’s in this drink?â and âthe answer is noâ â were the lyrics sited for controversy.
The station stated that the song was written in a âdifferent time,â adding the #MeToo movement was the reason it removed the song.
âThe world we live in is extra sensitive now, and people get easily offended, but in a world where #MeToo has finally given women the voice they deserve, the song has no place,” the radio station added.